Convalescent Plasma to Treat Covid-19: a Randomized Double Blind 2 Centers Trial (preprint)

In SARS-CoV-2, there is an overactivation of the immune system that triggers systemic hyperinflammation that causes lung damage; therefore, the use of convalescent plasma (CP) has been considered for its immunological mechanisms that could benefit patients in moderate and severe stages of the disease. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the use of convalescent donor plasma for COVID-19 to reduce mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 stage II (moderate) and stage III (severe) disease.Material and methodsA double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from May 20 to December 10, 2020. Thirty-nine participants with moderate (II) and severe (III) stage COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR and tomography were included. The study randomization rate was set at 3:1. Convalescent plasmas were chosen for application with a neutralizing antibody titer of ≥ 1:32. Patient follow-up included assessment by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and use of the Oxygenation Index (PAO2/FIO2) index and monitoring of blood markers, such as C Reactive Protein (CRP), D-Dimer (DD), ferritin, IgG antibody titers against SARS-COV-2, and inflammatory cytokines at days three and seven post-treatment.ResultsWe observed a significantly lower 21-day post-transfusion mortality HR: 0.17 [95.0% CI 0.07-0.45, p<0.001] in the group receiving convalescent plasma compared to the control group; protective units (PU) in the group receiving convalescent plasma after seven days were significantly higher 512 (32-16384) vs 96 (32-256), p=0.01; the SOFA scale decreased to 3.7 ± 2.02 vs 7.1 ± 2.8, p<0.001 and the PAO2/FIO2 index showed a significant improvement in the group receiving convalescent plasma 251.01 ± 109.4 vs 109.2 ± 62.4, p<0.001, vs the control group. In terms of safety, no adverse events related to the transfusion of convalescent plasma were observed.ConclusionConvalescent plasma is safe and effective, as it decreases mortality in the convalescent plasma group compared to the control group. 

CXCL17 is a Prognostic Biomarker That Distinguishes Severe Pandemic InfluenzaA(H1N1) from COVID-19 (preprint)

BackgroundCXCL17 is chemotactic for myeloid cells, exhibits broad-spectrum bactericidal activity, and is expressed in mucosal tissues. This chemokine is constitutively expressed in the respiratory tract, suggesting a role for CXCL17 in lung defenses. However, little is known about the possible participation of CXCL17 during respiratory infections in humans. Here, we evaluated the role of CXCL17 as a biomarker in patients with severe pandemic influenza A(H1N1) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in hospitalized patients with severe influenza A(H1N1) and COVID-19 admitted to two national reference centers in Mexico City. Peripheral blood samples were obtained on admission for determinations of the serum levels of CXCL17 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The expression of CXCL17 in lung autopsy specimens from patients that succumbed to both diseases was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHQ). Serum CXCL17 levels were compared between patients grouped according to their disease and clinical outcome. The diagnostic and predictive value of serum CXCL17 levels was evaluated using machine-learning algorithms and regression analyses. ResultsA total of 92 patients were enrolled in the study, from which 68 were infected with influenza and 24 had COVID-19. Their clinical characteristics were similar, although dyspnea, rhinorrhea, and sputum production were more common during influenza, whereas dry cough and vomit were more frequent among COVID-19 patients. Both diseases induced the local expression of CXCL17 in the lung. However, serum levels of CXCL17 were increased only in patients with influenza but not COVID-19. CXCL17 not only differentiates influenza from COVID-19 but serves as a prognostic biomarker associated with mortality and renal failure in influenza patients. Using cell culture assays, we also identified that human alveolar A549 cells and peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages produce CXCL17 after influenza A(H1N1) pdm09 virus infection. ConclusionsOur results suggest a possible role for CXCL17 in the pathogenesis of influenza A(H1N1), supporting the use of this molecule as a prognostic biomarker. Future studies on the role of CXCL17 in COVID-19 are warranted.  

Clinical and immunological factors that distinguish COVID-19 from pandemic influenza A(H1N1) (preprint)

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is a global health threat with the potential to cause severe disease manifestations in the lungs. Although clinical descriptions of COVID-19 are currently available, the factors distinguishing SARS-CoV-2 from other respiratory viruses are unknown. Here, we compared the clinical, histopathological, and immunological characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and pandemic influenza A(H1N1). We observed a higher frequency of respiratory symptoms, increased tissue injury markers, a histological pattern of alveolar pneumonia, and higher levels of IL-1RA, TNF-, CCL3, G-CSF, APRIL, sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, sCD30, and sCD163 in influenza patients. Conversely, dry cough, gastrointestinal symptoms, interstitial lung pathology, increased Th1 (IL-12, IFN-{gamma}) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13) cytokine levels, along with IL-1{beta}, IL-6, CCL11, VEGF, TWEAK, TSLP, MMP-1, and MMP-3, were observed in COVID-19 cases. We demonstrated the diagnostic potential of some clinical and immune factors to differentiate COVID-19 from pandemic influenza A(H1N1). Our data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 induces a dysbalanced polyfunctional inflammatory response that is different from the immune response against influenza. These findings might be relevant for the upcoming 2020-2021 influenza season, which is projected to be historically unique due to its convergence with COVID-19.